home › resources & publications › the case for activity models
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS:
The case for activity models
- PUMP 2010
In this position paper, we argue that user modeling systems would benefit by explicitly modeling user activities. We give examples where systems without activity inference fail to perform as desired, and briefly describe both benefits (combining data from multiple sources, learning from multiple users, improving code and technique reuse, and collecting user feedback) and costs (system complexity, development time, and inference limitations).
citation
Partridge, K.; Brdiczka, O. The case for activity models. Pervasive User Modeling and Personalization 2010 (PUMP); 2010 June 20; Big Island, Hawaii.
PARC author
related focus areas
related publications
RetroTime: retrospectively visualizing and labeling time intervals
Enhanced personalized information delivery
Workshop on hybrid pervasive/digital inference
Inferring personality of online gamers by fusing multiple-View predictions
PiCoDa: privacy-preserving smart coupon delivery architecture
Ubiquitous semantics: how to create and navigate a personal semantic network
